Drafted with AI assistance, then checked and revised by the author. The judgements and the errors are the author’s. How this site is written sets out what is declared on every piece, who checks it, and where the per-piece record lives.
What this publication does not claim, and what is outstanding against it in the register.
A question this rests on is parked: What counts as complete state for a cluster?
We do not claim a defined completeness boundary for cluster state; we claim the criteria in DEL-06 and nothing beyond them.
A question this rests on is parked: What secession premium will members bear?
We publish no pricing and no affordability claim, and we do not assert that members value the secession guarantee.
A question this rests on is parked: What do we do with an application that refuses to run inside the boundary?
We do not claim that a member's existing applications can be made to run inside the boundary. We claim only that the boundary reveals which ones cannot.
A question this rests on is open: Does secession capability actually convert a buyer?
What this publication rests on, and how solid each part of it is. The blueprint is a specification, and this page describes it as one.
No external citations. This publication cites no studies, no reports and no outside sources, and this page does not manufacture any. Its claims either derive from the constitution this project is built on, or from evidence recorded inside the corpus, or they are the reasoning of the document itself. Each is separated below.
Foundational documents. These are positions this project has taken, not findings.
| Record | What it is | Status |
|---|---|---|
CON-01 |
Purpose | draft v0.1 |
SUB-00 |
Substrate requirements — preamble | draft v0.1 |
None. This publication references no evidence record. That is the correct description of what it is rather than a gap: it is a specification, reasoning from the foundational documents above rather than reporting a measurement. Where it states a number, that number is marked in the text as what it is.
| Record | What it is | Status |
|---|---|---|
CON-03 |
Member ownership of member infrastructure | draft v0.1 |
CON-04 |
Non-extraction | draft v0.1 |
CON-07 |
Cluster secession guarantee | draft v0.1 |
CON-15 |
Co-operative form and member control | draft v0.1 |
CON-16 |
B-class shares are pegged to capability, not dollars | draft v0.1 |
CON-17 |
A-class capital is patient and exits | draft v0.1 |
CON-30 |
Two kinds of participation earn membership | draft v0.1 |
STR-12 |
Who this is for | draft v0.1 |
SUB-01 |
Egress control with signed attestation | draft v0.1 |
SUB-02 |
Substitutable inference endpoint | draft v0.1 |
SUB-03 |
Per-record authority, default deny | draft v0.1 |
SUB-05 |
Complete-state export | draft v0.1 |
SUB-09 |
Supply-chain manifest and change notice | draft v0.1 |
SUB-10 |
Inference on member-controlled hardware | draft v0.1 |
Open questions this publication is known to be exposed to. They are recorded rather than resolved, and the set card counts them.
OQ-02OQ-03Generated from the corpus, not written by hand: this page cannot claim a source the corpus does not hold, and it changes when the records do.
Alongside: the publication · questions and answers · glossary