Sources and provenance — Running an organisation where agents do the work

Sources and provenance for Running an organisation where agents do the work · v0.4 · 4 September 2026

Drafted with AI assistance, then checked and revised by the author. The judgements and the errors are the author’s. How this site is written sets out what is declared on every piece, who checks it, and where the per-piece record lives.

Status of these claims#

What this publication does not claim, and what is outstanding against it in the register.

Quoted research without a source record: 5 passages in this publication are quoted verbatim from external research and carry a citation marker that resolves to nothing in this corpus. The quotations are reproduced as written; the sources are not recorded here, so treat the attributions as unverified until they are.

What this publication rests on, and how solid each part of it is. Running an organisation where agents do the work is a framework, and this page describes it as one.

What it does not have#

No external citations. This publication cites no studies, no reports and no outside sources, and this page does not manufacture any. Its claims either derive from the constitution this project is built on, or from evidence recorded inside the corpus, or they are the reasoning of the document itself. Each is separated below.

What it derives from#

Foundational documents. These are positions this project has taken, not findings.

Record What it is Status
CON-20 Three layers and ledger accountability draft v0.1
STR-11 Robustness is the design objective, not performance draft v0.1

Evidence#

None. This publication references no evidence record. That is the correct description of what it is rather than a gap: it is a framework, reasoning from the foundational documents above rather than reporting a measurement. Where it states a number, that number is marked in the text as what it is.

Also referenced#

Record What it is Status
CON-13 Claims carry evidence draft v0.1
CON-14 Drills produce published evidence draft v0.1
CON-22 Institutional judgement is written down draft v0.1
CON-26 Heterogeneity is mandatory draft v0.1
CON-27 Dissent has a structural route draft v0.1
CON-28 Sampled human verification never reaches zero draft v0.1
CON-30 Two kinds of participation earn membership draft v0.1
STR-12 Who this is for draft v0.1

Generated from the corpus, not written by hand: this page cannot claim a source the corpus does not hold, and it changes when the records do.

Alongside: the publication